|
Navigation
Categories
Entries by Month
| September, 2009 (1) |
| May, 2008 (2) |
| March, 2008 (5) |
| December, 2007 (1) |
| October, 2007 (1) |
| September, 2007 (2) |
| May, 2007 (1) |
| April, 2007 (5) |
| October, 2006 (1) |
| July, 2006 (2) |
| June, 2006 (5) |
| January, 2006 (2) |
| December, 2005 (6) |
| November, 2005 (7) |
| October, 2005 (9) |
| September, 2005 (2) |
| August, 2005 (11) |
| July, 2005 (14) |
| June, 2005 (3) |
| May, 2005 (5) |
| April, 2005 (5) |
| March, 2005 (5) |
| February, 2005 (5) |
| January, 2005 (11) |
| December, 2004 (10) |
| November, 2004 (4) |
| October, 2004 (1) |
| September, 2004 (7) |
| August, 2004 (8) |
| July, 2004 (8) |
| June, 2004 (4) |
| May, 2004 (13) |
| April, 2004 (14) |
| March, 2004 (25) |
| February, 2004 (1) |
| May, 2003 (5) |
| April, 2003 (5) |
| March, 2003 (4) |
| February, 2003 (1) |
| January, 2003 (6) |
|
 Thursday, October 13, 2005
Eric Rucker is blogging about Access 12. His post today discussed changes to the underlying engine to provide "full schema compatibility with Windows SharePoint Services lists." A benefit of this change: "This allows us to take SharePoint list data offline and to provide rich-client UI for SharePoint using Access."
I see this as quite a big deal. Consider the number of Access developers compared to the number of InfoPath developers. Consider the number of installed Access licenses compared to the number of InfoPath licenses. I would not be surprised if this dramaticlly slows the acceptance of InfoPath.
Look closely at the far left of this image:

Ahhh...those were the days.
The amusing point -- this image was grabbed from the screen during an installation of SQL Server SP4 (2005).
 Monday, October 10, 2005
 Friday, October 07, 2005
I am honored to join the ranks of bloggers at http://www.mindsharpblogs.com -- the home of Bill English, Todd Bleeker and others. If you are new to SharePoint, this is a must-see site.
 Thursday, October 06, 2005
 Wednesday, September 28, 2005
 Thursday, September 15, 2005
 Tuesday, August 30, 2005
Sometimes, it seems that the .MDB file will live forever. I recently had to convert some DDL so it would work against the Jet data engine. (Jet does not use ANSI SQL.) In the depths of the MSDN archive was a very useful reference series: Fundamental Microsoft Jet SQL for Access 2000. This page links to two more -- titled Intermediate and Advanced.
 Saturday, August 27, 2005
If you are using active generation of templates, here is a build script that invokes CodeSmith:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="unicode"?> <project name="nant" default="compile" xmlns="http://nant.sf.net/schemas/nant.xsd"> <property name="CodeSmith" value="cs.exe" />
<target name="compile" depends="genruntime" description="Compile entire solution"> <solution solutionfile="src\project.sln" configuration="release"> <webmap> <map url="http://localhost/ProjectWeb" path="src\ProjectWeb" /> </webmap> </solution> </target> <target name="genruntime" description="Generate O/R Classes for the runtime library"> <exec program="${CodeSmith}" basedir="tools\codesmith" workingdir="src\ProjectWeb.Runtime"> <arg value="/t: Templates\ClassGenerator.cst" /> <arg value="/ps: ORClasses.xml" /> </exec> </target>
This script was influenced by Mike Roberts' article How to setup a .NET Development Tree. (Thanks Mike!) I use a property to alias the CodeSmith command (cs.exe) because I kept thinking csc (which compiles C# code).
|
|
Search

Powered by: newtelligence dasBlog 2.2.8279.16125
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do
not represent my employer's view in anyway.
© Copyright 2010, Paul Schaeflein
E-mail
|